Skip to main content

Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid / 50 termini psicologici e psichiatrici da evitare

"Scott O. Lilienfeld del Dipartimento di Psicologia della Emory University di Atlanta (USA) e colleghi hanno [...] pubblicato su Frontiers in Psychology un articolo singolare, forse il primo nel suo genere, che passa in rassegna "50 termini psicologici e psichiatrici da evitare": in pratica una "lista di frasi e parole inaccurate, fuorvianti, usate in modo improprio, ambigue e logicamente confuse" dalle quali è meglio tenersi a debita distanza..."
leggi l'intero articolo su Brainfactor.it.

Link all'articolo originale Scott O Lilienfeld et al., Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: a list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases.

Classification of inaccurate, misleading words and phrases etc. / Classificazione delle parole o frasi imprecise, fuorvianti ecc.:
[29] Inaccurate or Misleading Terms / Termini imprecisi o fuorvianti
[5] Frequently Misused Terms / Termini di frequente uso improprio
[4] Ambiguous Terms / Termini ambigui
[7] Oxymorons / Ossimori
[5] Pleonasms / Pleonasmi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Derek Walcott "Alla fine di questo verso c'è una porta che si apre"

Derek Walcott (1930-2017) sul sito "Letteratura" di Rai Cultura

About limits of forensic science / Sui limiti della scienza forense

"Wrongful convictions occur with shocking frequency in the United States. A record 166 exonerations were recorded in 2016 by the National Registry of Exonerations, bringing the total since 1989 to nearly 2,000. This represents only a fraction of those who should never have been sent to prison.

In 2005 I produced a documentary showcasing several cases in which flawed forensic analyses helped to get innocent people locked up. Riky Jackson went behind bars for two years because of incorrectly matched fingerprints. Jimmy Ray Bromgard spent nearly 15 years in jail, mainly because of hair comparisons that lacked scientific rigour. Now I’m a scientist who uses data analysis to promote human rights, and I’m disheartened to see these errors continue. That is why I hope that a US federal commission will vote next week to endorse practices that would transform how forensic analysts talk about evidence..." segue su "Nature" l'articolo Label the limits of forensic science,…